8/25/2023 0 Comments World of warships reddit atagoTapering them for historical accuracy would be gameplay nerf, and this is not something we want for cruisers. We are not going to split cruiser belts into such sections. Belt backing armor is apparently missing-there should be another 19mm plate laminated behind the main machinery belt. If there is truly such inconsistency, we will fix it.Īll three belts should taper to 76mm well below the waterline (sources conflict on machinery belt-may have tapered to 82.55mm instead). The evidence available suggests the 95mm-38mm arrangement. I really can’t blame WG for this, as the book directly contradicts itself. US Cruisers doesn’t specify, but it appears the forward part of the sides was 95mm, and the rear 38mm. Turret sides should not be 38mm, but 95mm-38mm. Turret faces should be 203mm thick, not 152mm. Forward and rear machinery bulkheads should be 76mm, not 89mm. Forward and aft magazine bulkheads should be 38mm, not 76mm. New Orleans: Source: Norman Friedman’s US Cruisers: An Illustrated Design History, 1945 Ordnance Pamphlet, Damage Reports for New Orleans, Astoria, San Francisco, Vincennes, and Quincy. However, there always will be some game tolerations and conventions (historical accuracy is important, but gameplay is more important anyways). Just like with visual models, we're gradually improving them. There are also cases when we expand our reference library and can re-work old models with new knowledge. It is mainly connected with server performance and internal mechanics. You have our most sincere respect.įoreword 2: Armor models in game have their limits in terms of detail quantity. u/drowned_man, for such deep and well-thought post. I promised to look into it, and here's the result.įoreword 1: Thank you, Mr. So there was this post a couple of weeks ago by u/drowned_man.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |